Ltr To K. Barrett, Mud-Slime Agent For
Jews
(Apollonian, 14 Jun 19)
Hello: I see now u seem to be
doing well as u've made posts on ur blogs, so that's good. But when I ck'd ur
one blog, truthjihadbook.blogspot.com, I noticed ur statement at the top,
regarding "...a total commitment to the organization he founded, the
Muslim-Jewish-Christian Alliance for 9/11 Truth."
And it occurred to me
that now ur sudden silence regarding our prospective int-view recording may well
be explained in way of this "Jewish" connection--a very dubious sign. For such
"connection" immediately and naturally brings up serious questions as to ur
basic integrity--and an answer to question regarding ur sudden, mysterious
non-communication. "Truthjihad"?--didn't u know truth is
anti-Semitic?--seriously--it's not a joke, and it has to do w. very basic tenets
of their filthy religion/philosophy.
Seriously, Jews never acknowledge
anything as truth unless it is officially pronounced by top Jews--such is nature
of Jew, Judaism, "Oral Law Trad." and "midrash." Jews are extreme subjectivists,
most practical and successful Satanists of all history, Jews always leading
organized Satanism--haven't u noticed this simple fact? For if Satanism is the
problem in general, Jews are the specific essence to it all--absolutely proven
by simplest logic and analysis.
For there's no "good" Jew, any more than
"good" psychopath (or Satanist, child-molester, etc.), and no decent person
identifies as Jew, except if he admits he was born one racially but now utterly,
totally rejects the religion/philosophy (religion is always at root philosophy).
But as academic it's inevitable u'd be sucked-in to that sort of utterly
compromised mentality--the very purpose of modern Jewified "edjumacation."
Unfortunately, the danger is now the public suspects u're involved w. Jews,
making gestures for them, even taking money--which must have occurred to u, but
u un-wisely shrugged it off.
For why wouldn't an honest discussion upon
Satanism cover the Jew-subject/issue?--at least in the e-mail discussion if not
in digitally recorded text. Evidently, u finally figured it all out. For note my
msg and analysis is really quite simple: (a) problem is Satanism, which people
might accept (and probably already do) as mere buzz-word generality.
(b)
But then I analyze it, Satanism, further, specifically, and exactly as extreme
subjectivism. (c) U quail fm this subjectivism, and try to writing it off (as u
noted) as mere "egotism," which is just more indulgence in buzz-word and
generality. (d) Finally, I connect Satanism and subjectivism specifically to
central-banking and fiat-currency which is the secret weapon Jews/Satanists make
use of against the stupid, corrupted, hubristic, now over-populated goyim--our
compatriots.
So we see now how u've been so effectively compartmentalized
and marginalized by the Jews, the satanic masterminds. But at least for a few
moments there u seemed to be genuinely interested in the subject, Satanism--this
was/is a good sign. It seems to me ur greatest weakness is this compulsion u
seem to have for abstractionizing--which people find difficult and
irrelevant.
But I'd encourage u nonetheless that ur original impulse was
what u should pursue regarding this extremely important issue of Satanism--it
isn't mere egotism; it has to do w. basic philosophy--subjectivism vs. honesty
and objective reality, necessary basis for any "truth," properly
understood--extremely relevant to society and culture, not mere psychology.
Further, it was and still is most useful and topical to examine this issue of
Satanism as I've demonstrated. And I'd still be happy to help u thus lose all ur
Jew "friends" and colleagues--u don't need them. U would be immediately banned
fm Jew-tube and other closely-associated platforms--u could only post our
discussion to independent sites like Bitchute.com. Take good care. A.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Below-copied are previous msgs exchanged, serving as basis for above by ap.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Beginning, fm first
To: Kevin Barrett <truthjihad@gmail.com> Jun 4 at 2:29 AM
Thanks
tremendously for ur guidance on these pt.s. I'm really looking for the essence
to things, esp. regarding religion, and one thing I have come away with
regarding Christianity is its anti-thematic nature to Pharisaism
(Talmudism)--which Pharisaism absolutely rules the world presently.
I
follow the analysis of M.A. Hoffman (RevisionistReview.blogspot.com) who
expounds Judaist "midrash"--the Jew ideal of "interpretation" for the benefit
and victory of Jews, who rather use God as their attack-dog and assassin,
celebrating mass murder on "Passover" holyday and "Purim" extermination of
Persian enemies by means of intrigue w. the Shah, etc., the Jew God being a
war-God, mere tool of Jews, God's greatest creation and glory, according to
Jews.
So, in analysis, Jews posit a SUBJECTIVE reality which they imagine
they can manipulate, w. help of their slave, God, which God only exists for use
of Jews, TRUTH (= Christ, Gosp. JOHN 14:6) being merely whatever the Jews
(rabbis) say it is. Thus Jews imagine they'll just kill anyone who disagrees w.
them--as they attempted against Christ (truth) who yet "resurrected" as one
can't kill truth anymore than one can kill the objective reality upon which
truth is necessarily based.
Note Satanism is, at root, simply extreme
SUBJECTIVISM by which consciousness/mentality is source of reality, making the
subject to be God, the creator. Jews then are simply most collectivist,
organized subjectivists--making them most effective, most successful, practical
SATANISTS--capable, by means of their sublime collectivism and organization to
dominate the more "individualist," unorganized, random goyim.
So would u
agree w. my analysis, above? And how then would u say Islam fits in? I always
thought Islam featured "submission" in obedience to command of Allah. Thanks
again for ur observations and advice.
------------------above by ap
in response to below-copied---------------------
On Monday, June 3, 2019
10:49 PM, Kevin Barrett <truthjihad@gmail.com> wrote:
That’s a
simplistic and misleading way of looking at it.
All religions and
ideologies could likewise be reduced to “command and obedience” and it would
likewise be misleading. (Communists are commanded to support the revolt of the
workers, capitalists to accept the rule of the rich, Christians to believe Jesus
is part of three-gods-in-one, etc.)
The essence of Islam is pure
monotheism: ecstatic self-submission to the Divine Oneness. From that flows the
renunciation of tyrannical egotism and insistence on truth and justice. All of
the details, rituals, secondary beliefs, etc. are scaffolding for that larger
essence.
----------------------above in response to below-copied by
ap-------------------------------
Beginning, original
On Jun 3, 2019, at 8:38 PM,
apollonian wrote:
Hello: I'm trying to contact K. Barrett who's Islamist,
and I want to ask question about Islam, to wit, (a) isn't Islam simply a
religion of command (and obedience), which one is required/commanded to
BELIEVE?--because Allah, speaking through Muhammud, commands?
I'll leave
it at that, regarding the essence of the religion. Thanks for ur time and effort
on this query of mine, here, above. A.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Below-copied by ap (Jun 4 at 11:08 AM)
in response to mud-slime K. Barrett's of 4 Jun 2019
(Apollonian, 4 Jun
19)
Ok, thanks much for ur commentary. I've always taken the
Christian position as emphasizing the objective reality--AGAINST the Pharisaic
subjectivism. Given that basic Christian objectivity, Christ (= truth) goes on
then to demonstrate the Christian ethic(s), based upon that metaphysical
premise, objectivity.
Do u see Islam as further dialectic to this basic
Christian vs. Pharisaic antitheses?--it seems to me that Islam is basically an
attempted simplification, removing the Trinity. But now u seem to say Islam
rather agrees more w. Pharisaist subjectivism.
Thus Christianity
indicates determinism, absolute cause-effect, no perfectly "free" human will,
humans doomed to sin in accord w. having their own will, but striving in reason
(and Holy Spirit, in accord w. Christianity) to mitigate that willfulness to
achieve much of Godly concord as possible. Thanks again for ur advice.
A.
---------------------above by ap in response to
below-copied-----------------
On Tuesday, June 4, 2019 10:43 AM,
Kevin Barrett <truthjihad@gmail.com> wrote:
I would phrase it
differently.
"Note Satanism is, at root, simply extreme SUBJECTIVISM by
which consciousness/mentality is source of reality, making the subject to be
God, the creator." [This aforementioned quote is by ap in his ltr to Barrett,
far above-copied, of 4 Jun 2:29 am.]
Consciousness IS the source of
reality. But the human ego is only a tiny fragment of consciousness, all of
which emanates from God. Life is a test in which we are being graded on our
ability to relinquish/annihilate our ego and the evil it commands, in a kind of
submission to God that moves us closer to God-consciousness and away from
ego-consciousness.
The Jewish elite analyzed in Guyénot’s From Yahweh to
Zion worships its own ego—Yahweh is a projection of the Jewish tribal ego—rather
than relinquishing ego in submission to God. Their approach is indeed
satanic.
Best, Kevin [preceding by Barrett is response to ap's
above-copied msg of 4 Jun, 2:29 am]
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Continuing dialectic btwn Barrett and apollonian, Jun 4 at 10:20 PM
Yes, I understand the "Sunnis" are more determinist than the "Shias" who are
more mystic, holding to a greater "freedom" of human will (if I'm not
mistaking). But I still struggle to see how Islam fits in the dialectic, the
Satanists led by Jews holding to extreme subjectivism against Christian
objectivity and TRUTH (the God-created objective reality being criterion for
such truth). Thus as Christians worship Christ, they worship truth. Christianity
can actually be understood as worship of truth.
But if everything is
subjective, as it seems u indicate regarding Islam, then "submission" and
obedience to command of Allah, transmitted through Muhammad, would seem to be
decisive ideal or principle of Islam--which would seem to make Islam mere
version of Judaist subjectivism (Jews merely insisting one follow the rabbis'
"midrash" interpretation). And the rejection of "Trinity" would then become mere
detail and pretext in face of this more fundamental objective vs. subjective
dichotomy which so radically differentiates Jew vs. Christian. Thanks as always
for ur clarifications on these pt.s.
------------------------above by ap
in response to below-copied----------------
On Tuesday, June 4, 2019
9:33 PM, Kevin Barrett <truthjihad@gmail.com> wrote:
God’s
consciousness is not “subjective." God is THE Truth, al-haqq. Human
consciousness is vastly less than that.
Muslims have debated free will
vs. predestination for a very long time with no clear winner.
This part
also describes Muslims even though the term “holy spirit” isn’t
used:
"...striving in reason (and Holy Spirit, in accord w. Christianity)
to mitigate that willfulness to achieve much of Godly concord as possible."
Amin! [preceding quote is fm ap's msg of Jun 4, 2019, at 11:08 AM]
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Ltr fm ap to Mud-slime, Barrett of Jun 8 at 1:23
AM
Hello: After thinking about our discussion earlier this week, I
thought to bring up some questions/issues for ur consideration.
1. Isn't
it at least legitimate, even really quite clear, question regarding Satanism as
running rampant in our world, so much causing horrendous problems as we find
ourselves facing?--and there are lots of instances I submit we could pt. out for
examples well indicating this outright Satanism, but esp. regarding (a) the
homosexuals and trans-genders and their increasing political power and
influence; (b) the Agenda-21 and -2030 "pop.-reduction," (c) and the far too
powerful corp.s so effectively forcing poison drugs and poison vaccines upon the
people, (d) including their glyphosate poisoning and contamination of food
supply, etc.
2. But then there's issue identifying exactly what this
Satanism is, how it works, etc. If u ck my previous notes to u on this Satanist
subject, u'll see I analyze it as extreme subjectivism--I wonder what ur
comments would be on this basic subject-matter regarding Satanism. I suspect u'd
be able to supply some useful commentary. And u'll note extreme subjectivism,
hence then Satanism, is actually quite a philosophic issue, not even so
exclusively "religious"--it (Satanism) then affects things psychologically and
politically, as we see.
3. I do believe u and both of us (at least we
two, but there might be others who also could comment usefully in addition)
might present some compelling and enlightening commentary, u coming fm ur
Islamic view-point, me fm Christian. I'm sure lots of people would be interested
in ur somewhat unusual (Islamic) perspective, given the typical
Christian-orientation of so many here in USA, not so familiar w. the Islamic pt.
of view on things.
4. For myself, I know I would comment upon the
corruption within the Christian world, so many (pretended) Christians (including
esp. the outright heretics known as "Judeo-Christian," and "Christian-Zionist")
supporting terror-state of Israel, lying, saying 'Christ was "Jew,"' and other
false and highly inaccurate things. For note how any "religion" starts upon
basic philosophic premises--Christian objectivity vs. Jew subjectivism, for
example.
5. I do believe we, u and I, at least, but quite possibly others
too (I can think of some right off-hand) might very well be able to have a
useful and informative discussion for benefit of many others in the world who
would be interested in hearing such a discussion by such as us to help begin and
to stimulate serious consideration of this crucial subject-matter--the gross,
horrendous satanic activity and mentality that threatens our world and people. I
submit the sooner we could begin this kind of discussion, leading to greater
consideration the better it would be for the world.
Thanks much for ur
consideration of the pt.s I bring-up here, above. Take good care, A.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Continuing dialectic w. mud-slime, Barrett, Jun 8 at 10:50
AM
Hello, and thanks much for ur reply. Before I would venture to
record anything, I'd first have to examine things for definitions (at least), as
u've said some things which I need to understand in more, better detail for
purposes of discussion. But otherwise, I'd be absolutely happy to record
discussion, thanks to u so kindly--I just want to be sure we were/are speaking
in terms we mutually understand for the good and use of
audience/listeners.
For if we want to discuss things for people in useful
manner, we'd have to agree at least generally upon such thing as Satanism, what
it is, how it works--we've surely done well for starting, but I think we need to
go a little further for details in order to be of serious use for
listeners/audience. U've already thrown me, a little bit at least, for ur use of
"materialism," ESP, and "quantum processes," just for starters.
Satan
(the supreme LIAR), of course, is one who insists HE'S God, and should be
worshipped--would u agree?--and how, more exactly would u see this issue
regarding satan? I know, pretty surely, that Christians see things as I just
noted--maybe not so much regarding subjectivism (a somewhat philosophic-type
notion) which might well take a little explaining as for what it is. Religion
begins w. basic philosophic tenets--would u agree?
I also have to admit
that I'm sure Christians would not at all accept this phrase, "quantum
processes," as it's just a buzz-phrase for them (as I have to admit it is for
me)--it would need definition which would still be rejected for practical
purposes, I suspect. The DANGER is getting off into vague abstractions which
will LOSE most listeners/audience to our discussion.
ESP could be
understood, though, but as Christian I wouldn't want to tax fellow Christians
for their toleration of such abstract notion. I hope u can see my wariness for
abstractions, my striving to keeping things simple as possible, as at basic
concrete kind of level.
I'm also not sure what u mean exactly by
"materialism"--aside fm the basic Greek understanding as that which is tangible
to sense-perception, touch, sight, hearing, etc.--how could it be "satanic"?--I
think it much better for us to thrash these things out so as to be best prepared
for useful discussion for listeners/audience--and I hope I'm not being too dense
for u.
Note Christians and Islamics have a common heritage for
understanding things in basic Aristotelian/Platonic terms, as Islamic culture
helped a great deal to preserving and understanding Aristotle, for example,
Thomas Aquinas quoting Avicenna and Ibn Rusheed for his (Aquinas's) own
exposition.
Thus I (and most Christians I know) keep to the basic
Greek/Aristotelian understanding for the "objective" assumption being a world
that exists outside our consciousness, purpose of consciousness being to grasp
such objective reality by means of perception and then logical reasoning and
abstraction. I and most Christians don't accept that consciousness could
possibly create reality--perhaps u're understanding things in a way we're
over-looking. I WILL ck-out ur ref. to Revusky, for sure.
I don't want to
tax ur kind patience, but be sure that I accept ur offer to record a discussion;
it's just I sincerely think it best for us to be certain as possible for mutual
understanding of basic terms--rather than having to thrashing things out over
the air, so to speak. By all means let me know how u see and understand things,
beginning w. this crucial, basic subject of Satanism which is destroying our
(political) world before our very eyes. Thanks again, A.
-------------------above by ap in response to
below-copied---------------------
On Saturday, June 8, 2019 8:27 AM,
Kevin Barrett <truthjihad@gmail.com> wrote:
This might make a good
topic for my radio show. Could you pre-record a show tomorrow or Monday? What
times could work?
I wouldn’t equate Satanism with subjectivism per se.
Satanism is extreme egotism—rebelling against God and instead worshipping one’s
own ego and its base desires.
Materialism, which is an extreme form of
objectivism, is satanic. Since the demise of Christianity as our main social
anchor, Western elites have adapted a worldview that is both Satanic and
materialistic. I call it secular-materialist progressivist humanism. Jon Revusky
calls it ARRF:
https://www.veteranstoday.com/2016/12/28/arrf/
The
high priests of this Satanic elite will figuratively burn you at the stake if
you tell them that reality is basically subjective, that ESP is real,
consciousness creates reality through quantum processes, etc. and that as a
result of this aspect of God’s scheme of things, the universe is absolutely
just, and we all get exactly what we deserve. These perennial truths undermine
the materialism (and subsequent moral relativism) that is central to their
false, Satanic religion.
Best, Kevin
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Below-copied by ap to Barrett at Jun 8 at 12:43
PM
Ok, sure, I guess we could do that Socratic-method, 30 mins (or
so) for either side. BUT then I'd have to take at least a few moments to collect
my thoughts as to what questions I'd have. For present though, I think we're
making good progress, and I'm happy to say u seem to be on same page as myself
regarding this crucial issue of Satanism. Most of all, I strongly suspect and
believe, we, u and I, should focus upon this subject of Satanism--esp. for sake
of our listeners/audience. The more we can converge upon this Satanism, the
better--would u agree?
I know for myself that my fellow Christians DO NOT
seem to take it (Satanism) seriously enough--and especially to understanding it
in specific terms--which I submit is best grasped by means of that idea of
extreme subjectivism, presumption of mere consciousness, pretending to creating
what only God could create--i.e. that objective, including "material," reality
which we assume exists, which we perceive, even though there may well be aspects
of it we're not aware of at the moment--we're not omniscient.
Another
good thing is ur excellent and scholarly ref. to Quran--we Christians, many of
us at any rate, much appreciate to knowing what and how the other religions and
religious think and understand, and I much commend u for such note u make for
us--it's authoritative too, u know, and thus we can more easily understand u're
not just making stuff up out of thin air. By all means, I hope u never hesitate
to challenge me for anything I say regarding Christianity, u never hesitating to
demanding a specific ref. as u consider appropriate or necessary.
Thanks
also for explaining ur understanding of materialism. We Christians of course
concede there's stuff we don't yet understand (or "see"), but existence must be
at least POTENTIALLY understandable, under some conceivable circumstance,
otherwise there's no basis (or evidence) for saying something exists--though it
(whatever) COULD exist.
Regarding "Renaissance magic and Cabala," u may
be assured we fairly well understand Renaissance, in general, BUT anything about
"magic" or "Cabala" is YOUR obligation for specific exposition and designation
to be made in specific, concrete terms as possible. Every age deals w.
superstition, etc., and "Cabala" is by definition mystic in nature which
mysticism Christians typically hold in contempt, I hope u can
understand.
So u see, by (extreme) subjectivism I'm referring to a lie,
or lying which exists ONLY in the mind of the liar (or subjectivist who's making
it all up fm his own perspective), BUT who yet insists nonetheless that it's
true because he merely wants it to be true--greatest example and pretext of this
lying (most often in guise of wishful-thinking, as of children who don't know
any better) is "good-evil" by which liars want to pretend they're better than
others.
For note we Christians believe we're all sinners who are DOOMED,
requiring God's mercy and grace for salvation. Human will is NOT perfectly
"free," but God creates us as necessarily, ineluctably self-interested, oriented
towards self-preservation no less than all the other animals--such is the nature
of that sort of "will" that we do possess--again, we're all sinners, always have
been, always will be.
I think we're herewith making excellent progress
setting-up for best kind of informed, but not presumptuous, discussion/dialectic
for benefit of our listeners/audience who are tired of empty theorizing and
abstractions, who yearn for a grasp of things that can be easily shared,
verifiable and CONCRETE as possible, to be shared easily among all, old and
young--NOT requiring too much sophistication--beginning w. Satanism, KEY concept
(not too abstract), yet most informative, useful, and crucial.
Thus
Satanism is extreme subjectivism making oneself (the subject) to be God, the
creator. Jews then are most effective, practical, and successful COLLECTIVIST
subjectivists (liars) most sublimely, most integrally organized. This last is
most practical conclusion to be (eventually) presented to listeners/audience,
all based upon solid premise we've established regarding Satanism--can we agree?
Thanks, Sincerely, A.
------------------above by ap in response to
below-copied---------------------
On Saturday, June 8, 2019 11:05 AM,
Kevin Barrett <truthjihad@gmail.com> wrote:
After the Fatiha, the
Qur’an begins:
"This is the Book about which there is no doubt, a
guidance for the God-conscious
who believe in the unseen, establish
prayer, and generously give/spend from what We have provided.” So the first
characteristic of the God-conscious is believing in the unseen.
The
crucial importance of ‘alam al-ghayb, the unseen dimension of reality, i.e. the
part not available to our senses, is a top Qur’anic priority. Materialism denies
this crucial dimension of reality. I suspect modern scientistic materialism was
designed and imposed by Satanic magicians to keep the sheeple ignorant and easy
to fleece. Study the history of Renaissance magic and Kabbala for
details.
As for Satan, yes, he’s the ultimate egotist, the ultimate liar,
the ultimate arrogant braggart who tries to substitute himself for God. The
magicians who want to rule the world themselves, rather than submit to God’s
rule, are satanic.
I think the best way to have this discussion would be
as an audio (radio) dialogue in which we could ask each other Socratic questions
so as to better understand each other. Maybe 30 minutes of you questioning me,
then 30 minutes of vice-versa?
Best, Kevin
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Here's ltr by ap to Barrett of 9 Jun Jun 9 at
1:21 AM, after Barrett broke off dialectic
Thus now to sum-up fm
previous expositions and notes, we see the Christian-rationalist view for things
having now become absolutely satanic--the problem of sociology, politics, and
economics we're presently facing.
For as reality is objective, human
consciousness merely designed to observe and perceive this objective reality, we
see then reality is DETERMINED according to absolute cause-effect, there being
no perfectly "free" will, humans being sinners, always working for their
interest, creatures of will--all this in accord w. God's will.
But now as
humans strive at the beginning stages of civilization, they start in honesty and
simplicity, keeping and maintaining that objectivistic mental orientation.
However, as we see fm Roman example in history (also now the American-Western
instance) we observe the original generations are honest and forthright having
to work and fight for victory and production.
But as the original
generations are successful, the following generations who inherit steadily
become HUBRISTIC, pretending evermore to subjectivism, pretending now to
non-existent perfectly "free-will," hubristic "good-evil" and false "moral
virtue," thus corruption--as we see fm Roman example, and now presently in
USA.
Thus note, given the objective, hence determinist nature of reality,
including humanity, observe the great CYCLIC history which takes place, the
human society beginning in honest, objectivistic manner, but steadily,
inevitably becoming corrupt and hubristic--as we see happening now in USA, the
people and culture becoming not only hubristic, but now down-right satanic,
indulging as they do in subjectivism, pretending they're "good" and "morally
virtuous," but utterly corrupt, the culture now imperialist, constantly engaged
in warfare--as we see.
A critical event takes place when the culture and
people adopt fiat-currency and central-banking by which real money, like
gold-silver, is thrown aside in stead of present fiat-CURRENCY which is
generated practically to infinite amount (constant "inflation"), the currency
steadily losing value, the people despoiled, defrauded, and destroyed--as we
see.
By means of this fiat-currency and central-banking, a satanic regime
is thus empowered, in absolute control of things, beginning w. the monopolist
central-banking and fiat-currency, and enforced by means of such as the corp.
mass-media, the corrupted leadership of the religious establishment, the
publically funded "edjumacation," etc.
Thus the culture is doomed to
inevitable horrific, catastrophic collapse as when the currency and economy
collapse--but always steered as things happen for the benefit and profit of the
top satanic masterminds who keep the people distracted by means of constant
warfare and "bread and circuses," football games, and food-stamps, etc.
Such then is the determinist, CYCLIC way of reality and history,
including economics, politics, and human psychology, civilizations and cultures
rising-up, but then inevitably collapsing in hubris, corruption and
Satanism--and we're presently and plainly in the stage of Satanism and impending
collapse. A.