* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Dan Begins Well For Necessary Analysis, But Then
Fails For Conclusions
(Apollonian, 26 May 18)
(Apollonian, 26 May 18)
Well Dan, I think u're right to pt.-out the lack of clarity for St. Germain people. After all, we (true) Christians, working fm basic text of New Test., say Christ = TRUTH, first and above all (Gosp. JOHN 14:6). Thus all Christian ethics follow fm this basic metaphysical precept, truth being only possible w. the objective (Aristotelian) reality as criterion/premise. "Treat others as one would be treated." Gosp. JOHN then makes satanism quite clear for what it stands for--LIES, at JOHN 8:44.
And the basic dialectic btwn Christ and Pharisees is regarding subjectivism of Pharisees, specifically their "midrash" (interpretation) of Torah which is essence of their Talmud, their definitive statement. See Talmudical.BlogSpot.com, RevisionistReview.BlogSpot.com, and Come-and-hear.com for best Talmudic expo.
Further, u should be advised that all present-day establishment "Christian" churches, Prot. and Catholic, are totally co-opted by the criminal central-bank establishment, including esp. the present US Federal Reserve bank (the "fed"), and essentially controlled by terror-state of Israel. Essentially, these various churches are oriented upon MYSTICISM (not truth, hence reason) which is used as cover for gross subjectivism and hence, satanism.
And they (these churches) refuse to admit Christ is truth and that Christianity is worship of truth above all. These mystic/satanic-oriented churches rather emphasize such things as "love," "faith," peace, and non-existent "good" (vs. the non-existent "evil"). Having been born and raised Catholic, I can attest the present-day "Vatican" is totally satanic gang of child-molesters, led by present satanic pope Francis, working for globalist world gov. and alien invasion, ethnic cleansing, and genocide of European countries, etc.
Another problem w. establishment "Christians," including "vatican" is their false understanding of "faith" which only properly means LOYALTY. These present-day mystics and satanists of establishment "Christianity" ("churchianity") tend to pushing "faith" as beleeeeeeeeeeeeving--as if "beleeeeeeeeeeeving" makes it all true--which is just idiotic, mystic, and satanic.
This unfortunate problem w. simple word, "faith," comes fm Gosp. JOHN and its emphasis upon "believing," which word ("believing") is used in that gospel no less than 99 times--so the weak-minded morons among nominal "Christians" seem to imagine that "beleeeeeeeeeving" something is a virtue and, evidently, what God and Christ want. But the word and "believing" as given in Gosp. JOHN really has to do w. actual PRACTICE of Christianity, worship of truth. Thus the true (practicing) Christian is thus referred to as a genuine "believer."
"Love" all by itself is not necessarily virtue, and note then the absurdity of Christianity as "religion of love"--as if "love" is what is worshipped. This confusion much seems to come fm the works of St. Paul and such as (Epistle) 1JOHN 4:8, where it says, "God is love." But this by JOHN is mere metaphor meant to contrast w. the Judaic/Talmudic war against humanity.
Christianity further does not advocate (political) "peace" at any price; it only brings an inner peace to the true Christian--and it doesn't advocate pacifism.
So u see, Dan, u're quite right to bring-up and examining basic definitions regarding Christianity, religion in general, and philosophy. The problem I see w. ur method is u only scratch the surface, and u reach no genuine substantial conclusions, u being satisfied in only and merely bringing-up topics and issues, but then just leaving them un-finished for proper analysis, pretending then u've done the job.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Below-copied essay by ap first submitted at comments, http://www.satanicsf.com/easter-satan-satanism/
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
New Test. Is LITERATURE First, Get A
Clue
(Apollonian, 25 May 18)
(Apollonian, 25 May 18)
Dan: u need to learn about literature, of which New Test. is one of the most glorious examples. Thus literature, the most elaborate and ambitious, is VEHICLE of philosophy. In New Test., following the older Old Test., it presents an allegoric account of (a) metaphysics, the objective (Aristotelian) reality, (b) following which is an ETHICS, this ethics so much idolized, admired, respected, revered, and even worshipped. Christian ethics is what makes New Test. and Christianity in general so famous as they obviously are, objects of tremendous and universal admiration.
Unfortunately, the metaphysical part of New Test. is overlooked, mis-represented, mis-understood, and ignored. (c) Note further, the New Test. story, such as it is, is presented much in elaborated DIALECTIC, esp. btwn Christ and the (satanic) Pharisees who preach the Talmudic "midrash" (interpretation), though formal Talmud hadn't been fully written-out till 500 AD in Babylon. Observe then the dialectic btwn objective view of Christ vs. (extreme) subjectivist of Pharisees.
Note further, New Test. is presented in way of story, epic, and myth, as most people were barely literate in those days, so Christ had to be adept in (a) speaking (rhetoric), and then (b) well-versed in the Old Test. literature so as to make things understandable to the people who understood things philosophic in way of what we call "religion," religion being something committed to memory and then practiced both in ritual and in daily life--religion then being something not only held within the intellect, but fully integrated (much as possible) throughout, body and spirit, intellect and emotion--this "religion" is still the case in present day for MOST PEOPLE, people in general having great difficulty w. formal philosophy, logic, science, etc.
Finally, regarding Easter, note the story requires this episode as the claim (Gosp. JOHN) is that Christ is God the Son, and only God is capable of such thing as resurrection. Hence the resurrection is the indication and proof for the readers and the people (as attested also by St. Paul) that Christ is God. Quit pretending New Test. and Gospels are presented as police-reports, text as mere accounting of facts and events--it's a STORY for purpose of conveying PHILOSOPHY, esp. in contrast and repudiation of the Pharisaic "Traditions of the Elders" which at the time was still mainly verbally understood among the Pharisees whom Christ reviled as gross heretics ("vipers and serpents"--Gosp. MATT, ch. 23).
Thus Christ defended what he held was original Mosaic Law--against the Pharisaic heretics--Christ merely re-stating, clarifying, and simplifying for the people.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Below-copied essay by ap first submitted at comments, http://www.satanicsf.com/atomwaffen-ona-satan-satanism/
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Dan Jokes About satanic "Principles"
(Apollonian, 26 May 18)
(Apollonian, 26 May 18)
Dan says, "Whereas most Satanists spend half our lives disavowing stereotypes about violence,...." But Dan, remember: u're SUBJECTIVISTS, holding reality is what u want it to be, u being the God-like creators of ur own reality (thorough-going subjectivists), eh?--but correct me if I'm wrong.
Then u tell us about, "Satanic principles like compassion, wisdom, and justice...." But Dan, as subjectivists, u HAVE NO "PRINCIPLES," at all, whatsoever, aside fm the founding, basic subjectivism--anything goes, as u're God, the creator of ur own universe, right?--but enlighten us if I'm wrong here.
Regarding the "Nazi" heroes, remember they are saints who dared to fight the satanists and Jews who imposed bolshevism and which Jews along w. their satanist cohorts continue to push "globalist" world dictatorship, featuring Agenda-21 and -2030 genocide. The "Nazis" only failed to see the larger program of Jews/Talmudists and (extreme) subjectivists, which is the real, most practical, collectivist, organized, and well-led satanism which presently threatens and oppresses the world, led by terror-state of Israel.
Unfortunately for Nazism and the world, the Nazis featured mostly a political program, nazis not nearly as adept for metaphysical and other abstract principles which are extremely important for fullest integrity of the large social purpose and effect--which requires a complete cultural system, not only political.
Note the "Nazis" attempted to make-up for the previous Christian culture and anti-semitism which had held together and built the glorious (and anti-semitic) Western civilization previous to the late modern era which ensued fm French Rev. and dominance of Jew-led central-banking, as of the Rothschilds. Now we struggle against the satanic/Jew world order and dictatorship as the struggle against Jew-led satanism continues.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Below-copied essay by ap first submitted at comments, http://www.satanicsf.com/dillahunty-...pticism-satan/
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
As Usual, Dan Fails To Follow-Out Implications Of
Observations
(Apollonian, 26 May 18)
(Apollonian, 26 May 18)
Dan tells us, "...truth is pretty elastic in America lately." And one cannot but agree and acknowledge the accuracy of such observation. But don't forget Oswald Spengler's great work, now about 100 yrs old, "Decline of the West." Folks, we're looking at the very break-down of Western civilization, so well described in New Test. "Book of Revelations," no less.
So what, historically, is happening? For note, Spengler describes a CYCLIC process and phenomenon which is similar to the great Roman example. Thus the culture is born of honest farmers who are fairly ignorant, but yet brave, these good people holding to the OBJECTIVE reality. Thus w. some luck, along w. their basic honesty and courage, these agrarian soldiers build their culture along w. military victories, and eventually they find themselves at the top of a thriving civilization--but this is merely the first part of the CYCLE--it isn't over.
Eventually, the "prosperity" becomes corrupted, as by means of central-banking (see Mises.org for expo; use their search engine) along w. the people, and as the culture ages, we see these corrupted people, the effete descendents of the original brave and honest heroes and founders, pretending to "moral virtue," esp. false, hereticalist "good-evil," and hence the SUBJECTIVIST view of reality--upon which such "moral virtue," esp. the false "good-evil," is sooo dependent.
And thus we see pretending to such false moral virtue and "good-evil" is actually, ironic as it may seem, the evermore intruding premise/pretext of subjectivism and satanism, the most extreme form of subjectivism, this satanism and subjectivism steadily eroding the culture. And just this very sort of subjectivism/satanism is precisely what has so much destroyed the USA, now the corrupted Jew S A, controlled and manipulated by Israeli terror-state. Trump is a liar, folks--it ain't "America first" at all--it's rather Israel first, and observe how Trump is sucking along w. Israel, and setting-up for a big hit against Iran.
Dan additionally tells us, "...Satanism is illusion, in emotional terms if nothing else. And that’s why it works." Well, yeah Dan, but even more pointedly, satanism is (extreme) subjectivism, the assumption reality is created by consciousness/mentality--it's actually simple and well-known metaphysical precept which rejects (Aristotelian) objectivity and makes us Gods, creators of our own reality. But there's more to this (satanism and subjectivism).
Imagine now we have a COLLECTIVE satanism/subjectivism by which a large group co-operates in a clever, well-hatched, and brilliantly-led "group-think"--or conspiracy. Isn't this sort of a group-think what criminals typically do?--of course some criminals are more successful than others.
So it is the whole world now, not only the West and Jew S A, has fallen victim to this criminality and satanism, esp. in form of central-banking like the US Federal Reserve bank (the "fed") which is literally legalized counterfeiting, the putting-out of ENDLESS "currency" (not real money which must be commodity-based, gold/silver being best) by which these criminals at the top rule and dictate, now owning everything and practically everybody.
So Dan, I merely submit u're actually quite accurate in much that u say, esp. at the beginning, BUT it's such a pity u don't bother to taking ur observations and analysis to the necessary end and conclusions. Do u think it's mere co-incidence ZOG has poisoned the food w. GMOs (genetically modified) and glyphosates?--poisoned the water w. fluoride, in so many cases, is engaged in poisoning the atmosphere w. "chem-trails" and geo-engineering, poisoned the air-waves w. electro-magnetic radiation, not to mention well-known nuclear poisoning, and determined upon Agenda-21 and -2030 GENOCIDE?--this is the real, practical satanism, Dan.
And it's interesting u don't consider the fruits of this putrid, but very real satanism which has been taking place under our very noses over the yrs now, esp. since the definitive domination of central-banking as of the Rothschilds' fm the Napoleonic wars and the "fed," since 1913.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Below-copied notes by ap first submitted at comments, http://www.satanicsf.com/patron-sinner-satanism/
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Dan: I thought I'd analyze ur statements, this blog, and see what we can observe and conclude. My notes are placed in brackets and capitalized to distinguished fm ur statements. U don't seem to realize how u babble such mindless nonsense, so inconsistent--even though that's good enough for subjectivism, truth be told.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
"On that note, Satanic San Francisco does not endorse flagrant lawlessness…except sometimes we do, because everyone does, because this is America. [RIGHTO DAN, BUT ACTUALLY, AS U'RE SATANIST, U'RE SUBJECTIVIST--ANYTHING GOES--SO U DON'T CARE ABOUT ANY "LAW" AS THAT IMPLIES AN OBJECTIVE REALITY. FACT, EASILY DEMONSTRATED AND REFERENCED, IS USA WAS MADE BY CHRISTIANS WHO HELD TO AN OBJECTIVE REALITY IN STRICT ACCORD W. LAW AND RULE THEREOF, BEGINNING W. THE NATURAL LAW AND OBJECTIVE REALITY, UNDERSTOOD BY CHRISTIANS AS LAW OF GOD, GOD UNDERSTOOD AS GIVING A DISTINCT (OBJECTIVE) ORDER TO REALITY WHICH IS NOT SUBJECTIVE.]
"It’s a country founded by a bunch of treasonous insurgents, after all. Or were they “patriots?” Tricky that. ["TRICKY" ESP. TO A SUBJECTIVIST LIKE URSELF, EH?--OR AT LEAST U IMAGINE IT'S "TRICKY" FOR OTHERS, BECAUSE IN SUBJECTIVIST REALITY, GOLLY, BUT IT COULD CHANGE. FOUNDERS OF USA DIDN'T AT ALL CONSIDER THEY WERE "TREASONOUS" TO THE ORDER AND REALITY WHICH COUNTED FOR THEM--FOR THEM, IT WAS OBJECTIVE, AND THEY ALWAYS TOOK CARE TO BE MOST REASONABLE IN ACCORD THEREWITH.]
"And as Bernice King constantly reminds us, Americans love to lionize her late father’s defiance of unjust laws, but only now that he’s no longer around. [BERNICE KING?--DAN, HAVE U CONSIDERED SHE'S ONLY SIGNIFICANT TO SUBJECTIVISTIC FOOLS LIKE URSELF?--MOST AMERICANS NEVER HRD OF HER AND COULD CARE LESS. AND U PRESUME AS TO THE "UNJUSTNESS" OF THE LAWS WHICH IS UR MERE PRESUMPTION/OPINION, WHICH OPINION OF URS ISN'T SUBSTANTIATED, MERELY ASSERTED AND DECLARED, AS USUAL FOR UR SORT--BUT OF COURSE, U DON'T CARE AS ANYTHING GOES FOR SUBJECTIVISTS. JUST BECAUSE U WORSHIP NEGROIDS DOESN'T MEAN THEY'RE SIGNIFICANT OR WORTHY OF ANY ATTN., EVEN IF SUBJECTIVIST LIKE URSELF THINKS SO. OF COURSE, U'RE ONLY PREACHING TO UR OWN LITTLE FACTION OF SUBJECTIVISTS WHO IMAGINE "BERNICE KING" IS SO WORTHY OF UR WORSHIP, EH?]
"The Satanic Temple (of which Satanic San Francisco is not an official chapter, FYI) even makes it a central tenet that sometimes “justice should prevail over laws.” As does everyone, when push comes to shove. [ACTUALLY, UR ONLY REAL PRECEPT IS THAT OF UR HERO, ALEISTER CROWLEY, WHO SAID "DOING WHAT THOU WILT" SHALL BE THE WHOLE OF THE LAW. SUBJECTIVISTS/SATANISTS HAVE NO "TENETS," BEYOND CROWLEY'S, EH?]
"(Except for those rebellious freethinkers at the Church of Satan, apparently. But to each their own…or to each a statute, in their case.) [HO HO, "FREETHINKERS"? SUBJECTIVISTS LIKE URSELF ARE NOTORIOUS FASCISTS, AND FASCISTS ARE NOTORIOUSLY SUBJECTIVE, THEIR WORD BEING LAW AUTOMATICALLY, NO NEED FOR ANY REASON OR RATIONALITY IN ACCORD W. OBJECTIVE LAW OR STANDARDS.]
"Theocrats [U SUBJECTIVISTS ARE GODS UNTO URSELVES--IN ACCORD W. NATURE OF SATANISM--UR OWN LITTLE "THEOCRATIC" SYSTEM, AS IT WERE. JUST TOO BAD U FOOLS CAN'T FIGURE IT OUT, EH?]
"...ask where morality ["MORALITY"?--WELL THAT'S ACTUALLY JUST LOGIC BTWN ENDS AND MEANS, MEANS REQUIRED TO BE CONSISTENT W. ENDS--AND WHAT DOES SUBJECTIVIST LIKE U CARE ABOUT SUCH LOGIC?--UR WORD AND WILL IS "LAW" RIGHT THERE, ISN'T IT?]
"...comes from if not from god; and autocrats [CK A DICTIONARY, DAN--U'RE AN "AUTOCRAT," WHICH AUTOCRACY IS SUBJECTIVISM BY DEFINITION.]
"...ask where justice ["JUSTICE"?--DOESN'T THAT REQUIRE A STANDARD, HENCE OBJECTIVITY?]
"...comes from if not from the law. The answer in both cases is the same: from our judgment. [ACTUALLY, AS SUBJECTIVIST, ALL REALITY, INCLUDING "JUSTICE" IS WHATEVER U WANT IT TO BE, WHEN U WANT IT--"JUDGMENT" HAS NOTHING TO DO W. IT.]
"None of us know absolutely what’s right. [ BUT AS SUBJECTIVIST, WHY WOULDN'T U KNOW?--AFTER ALL, ANYTHING GOES, AND IT'S WHATEVER U WANT--AND WHAT DOES "JUDGMENT" HAVE TO DO W. IT?--IT'S WHATEVER IS UR WILL--HECK W. JUDGMENT, EH?]
"If we did, we’d never make mistakes. [BUT THEN WHAT WOULD BE A "MISTAKE"?--AS SUBJECTIVIST AND SATANIST, U'RE NEVER WRONG, AS THAT WOULD IMPLY SOME STANDARD WHICH COULDN'T EXIST WITHIN UR SUBJECTIVIST REALITY.]
"The best we can do is decide. [WHAT?--WHATEVER U DO IS ALREADY THE "BEST"--"BEST" IMPLIES A STANDARD WHICH IMPLIES SOMETHING OBJECTIVE WHICH DOESN'T EXIST FOR SUBJECTIVIST LIKE U SATANISTS.]
"We consider the facts, the context, the ramifications, and hopefully also our own biases, and then we make a call. [BUT U DON'T EVEN HAVE TO DO THAT--JUST MAKE A CALL, ANY CALL, OR WHATEVER, AND THAT'S GOOD ENOUGH FOR U SUBJECTIVISTS.]
"We do this not necessarily because it’s a perfect method, [WHAT?--WHAT DIFF. DOES IT MAKE?--WHATEVER U DO IS GOOD ENOUGH FOR SUBJECTIVIST/SATANIST. AND "PERFECT," ITSELF, IMPLIES SOME KIND OF STANDARD, DOESN'T IT?]
"...but because it’s virtually the only one. Any other standard surrenders to absurdity. [WHAT?--U HAVE ONLY ONE STANDARD--SUBJECTIVISM--THERE IS NO OTHER. AND HOW COULD ANYTHING BE "ABSURD" IN SUBJECTIVIST REALITY?--"ABSURDITY" ONLY MAKES SENSE IN OBJECTIVE REALITY.]
"In the myth of Satan, the devil is the first and the greatest revolutionary. [SATAN IS GOD, SUCKER--DID U FORGET? AND "REVOLUTIONARY" IMPLIES AN OBJECTIVE REALITY--A RIVAL OR ALTERNATIVE TO THE SATANIC SUBJECTIVE ORDER, SUCH AS IT IS.]
"In our own lives, a state of constant revolution is rarely practical. [HERE, U IMPLY AN OPPRESSIVE OBJECTIVE (OR OTHER) SORT OF REALITY TO UR OWN SUBJECTIVISM.]
"The best most of us can hope for is reasonable, compassionate, necessary defiance when confronted with a truly unjust standard." [WHAT IDIOCY, DAN: "REASONABLE," BY DEFINITION, IMPLIES AN OBJECTIVE REALITY--"COMPASSION" IS MORE UR (EMOTIONAL) STYLE, RIGHT? AND "NECESSARY"?--DOESN'T EXIST IN SUBJECTIVE, SATANIC. "STANDARD"?--DOESN'T EXIST FOR THE SUBJECTIVIST. AND WHATEVER IS IS JUST, ACCORDING TO THE SUBJECTIVIST, RIGHT?]
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
So I thought I'd pt.-out just some of the logical inconsistencies of ur so profound satanic thought. U don't seem to understand that u're necessarily subjectivistic as u're satanic, but if I'm wrong, pls don't hesitate to explain how I'm wrong, what I'm missing about ur sublime satanism. For if satanism is too hard to understand, then what good is it?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Below by ap was not published by the kike-Satanist]
What's this?--the Satanist moron "edits" my notes again, saying, "And then he goes off with some racist nonsense. Naturally." -D
But what's "nonsense" about racism, sucker?--don't u have an argument to make here, brainless scum?--ho ho ho ho ho. For racism is VIRTUE, sucker--the virtue of LOYALTY--didn't u know that, dumbass punk? After all, u express ur loyalty to ur beloved Jews, eh?--ho ho ho ho ho ho ho--so u're "racist" no less, one observes.
Of course, satanist/subjectivist makes up his own rules as he goes--anything else would imply an objective standard which the satanist moron, pretending he's so smart, desperately must reject, the poor little dumbass piece-of-shit, ho ho ho ho ho ho
No comments:
Post a Comment