The satanist is sooooo outraged at mere truth and facts....

Below-copied by ap submitted at comments, http://www.unz.com/pgiraldi/benefiti...omment-2777149

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

History?--Simply Accounting Of The Past
(Apollonian, 23 Jan 19)

What?--Rothbard is not historian?--so do thou need a leg to standing-upon? WHAT do thou actually know about history?--not very much, we see.

The KNOWN, proven hist. facts verify Germany was viciously attacked by UK, France, and Russkie (and Serbians, indirectly, who attacked Austria by murdering the Archduke) conspirators in 1914, which they'd been planning since 1904, in case of UK and France ("Entente Cordiale"), and 1907 for Russkies. Germans were then falsely blamed for start of war (Versailles Treaty), and horribly treated, leading to election of unc' Adolf--which was actually what SAME conspirators, including USA wanted, so as to starting ANOTHER neat war for consolidation of world gov., bolshevik dictatorship--people weren't tired of it all yet--they NEVER are, humans being murdering sinners.

And once one faces up to the gross lies of holohoax, one sees what hero unc' Adolf really was, how Germany was doomed, fm way back in 1907, Hitler and Germans simply fighting a hopeless defense against cannibals led by Jews. It's actually hard to blame Jews for having such contempt for such stupid goyim.


-----------------above by ap in response to below-copied--------------------

# 570, Anon[436] • Disclaimer says:
January 23, 2019 at 1:22 pm GMT • 100 Words
@jacques sheete

You do seem keen to hold on to your straw man of people allegedly accusing Hitler of wanting to take over the world. But Murray Rothbard’s linked 1966 flight of rhetoric, with not an ounce of actual evidemce, in favour of historical revisionism gives you negative support. It reads like the rant an op ed writer with a bad hangover might dictate to meet a deadline. Rothbard had some arguable points to make about economics but he is not a “historian” just because he writes some historical stuff, let alone because he praises revisionism.

Far from that Rothbard emission being cause for me to apologize to you, you ought to be apologizing to me for easting my time on such low grade stuff.


------------------below-copied by "anon" in response to my above---------------

# 574, Anon[312] • Disclaimer says:
January 24, 2019 at 5:47 am GMT
@apollonian

Piss off and stop wasting our time with wild unsubstantiated assertions. Rothbard, who had a few IQ points and facility with lucid language would have been embarrassed by your support.