REFERENCE EXPOSITIONS

Saturday, February 9, 2019

Don't give me this "nurture [actually, "free will"] over nature" crap--reality is objective, hence necessarily determined (absolute cause-effect, no perfectly "free" will)....

Below-copied by ap submitted at comments, http://www.unz.com/jthompson/healthy...-genetic-code/

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Thompson Must Face Up To Metaphysics Which No "Science" Or "Experiment" Can Deny
(Apollonian, 9 Feb 19)

WHUT?--<blockquote>"One cannot disprove a general correlation by choosing one case."</blockquote> Well, ok, so HOW MANY does it take?--2, 3, 4--18?--ho ho ho ho. Here we see Thompson trying to submerge within the trees of the forest, hoping to get sooo lost within details that he's no longer responsible for the thesis regarding <blockquote>"post codes being more important than genetic codes,...."</blockquote> Thus it's just another moronic excuse-laden shambles of scientific-styled jargon and psycho-babble pretending to "nurture over nature," against the necessary determinism (absolute cause-effect), in favor of the usual, hubristic, perfectly "free" (God-like) human will, foundation of Satanism (extreme subjectivism--idea reality is created by mind/consciousness, making subject God, the creator--Satanism, by definition)--which Satanism humanity so desperately struggles with in this very day of Agenda-21 and -2030 GENOCIDE.

Thompson needs to face simple fact science by definition is founded upon (Aristotelian) objectivity, hence identity and non-contradiction (logic). Hence no possible "science" can conceivably demonstrate non-determinism (no absolute cause-effect)--like no science, necessarily built upon non-contradiction (logic) can prove reality is not objective, not in accord w. non-contradiction. Why?--and How is this (regarding inability of science to prove reality is not in accord w. non-contradiction)?--well, because it would be contradictory--ho ho ho ho ho.

And if "nurture" could overcome nature--THAT would be obviously contradictory, ho ho ho ho. For plainly, nature is the very basic thing which nothing else can overcome--for if it COULD so "overcome," then that would necessarily be built-in within the original "nature."

So race and racism are quite valid and of great importance, racial loyalty being the usual outstanding virtue as we racists have always held, racism known and understood as virtue to all races and cultures of all peoples throughout history. "Anti-racists" are simply SUBJECTIVISTS and Satanists, and they're the very people presently pushing Agenda-21 and -2030 genocide. Q.E.D.


-------------------above by ap in response to below-copied---------------------

# 53, James Thompson says: • Website
February 9, 2019 at 11:21 pm GMT
@CanSpeccy

One cannot disprove a general correlation by choosing one case. Furthermore, in measuring brain size at autopsy one may need to correct for age. More to the point, the actual correlation is about o.3 See Tim Bates’s interchange with Wicherts about the samples included in the latter’s meta-analysis.

No comments:

Post a Comment