REFERENCE EXPOSITIONS

Sunday, October 22, 2017

Now Hoffman desperately diverts to another subject to hide his incompetence and lying about "usury," central-banking, etc.,....

Below-copied essay by ap first submitted at comments, https://revisionistreview.blogspot.c...ica-first.html

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *


Hoffman's Research, Scholarship Is Flawed, Questionable
(Apollonian, 22 Oct 17)

Hoffman: we notice u cut-off and excluded commentary for ur previous blog article, putting-up this latest article on George W, for distraction. After all, we KNOW what the game is, right?--it's "good-Jew" vs. "bad-Jew," right? On the left there's the atheistical "globalists" pushing Agenda-21 and -30 genocide, versus the "right" Jews of Christian-Zionists, neo-cons, and Trump pushing Israel-First.

In fact, there's strong evidence Trump is himself Jew: see http://rense.com/general96/trumpjewish.htm.

So who and what's top power?--it's the central-bank (legalized counterfeiting) which substitutes CURRENCY for real (commodity-based) money, enabling the nearly endless proliferation/replication of this fraudulent currency, devaluating the currency previously existing ("inflation")--see Mises.org for expo.

And it's this "central-banking" criminal imposition of funny-money CURRENCY which is the real "usury" referenced in Bible--NOT the mere loaning, whether of money or currency--which u fail to note in all ur incompetent exposition and "research," including ur book, "Usury...."

And the question is, Hoffman: what is ur ref. in Bible for "usury" being mere loaning of money?--u don't have one--and u lie when u tell people "usury" is loaning of money. So give us the citations fm the Bible which founds and underlies ur work and book--what's so difficult about this?

Wednesday, October 18, 2017

Hoffman describes Talmud w. accuracy, but cannot apply a strict, rationalist analysis--why?--because he's mystic, Pharisaic, desperate to pretend to "good" and "charity"....

Below-copied essay by ap first submitted at comments, https://revisionistreview.blogspot.c...c-law-not.html

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *


Hoffman's Failure For Philosophic Analysis
(Apollonian, 18 Oct 17)

Hoffman admits essence of his entire philosophy in his first sentence, last paragraph, this article, "[o]ne wants to be charitable." Indeed, this is Hoffman's entire and primary impetus--he wants to play the virtuous, the "moral," the "mighty-white," no less than the Pharisees he pretends to criticize.

Indeed, Hoffman would rather be "charitable" (and "mighty-white") than to be TRUTHFUL, in accord w. Christ = TRUTH TRUTH TRUTH, above all (Gosp. JOHN 14:6).

And the ESSENCE of Talmudism is (a) SUBJECTIVISM--law and reality means whatever rabbis say it does, all in accord w. "midrash" (interpretation) and "Oral Law Tradition." (b) Further, the Jews practice a COLLECTIVISTIC subjectivism, a sublime, well-organized, and well-led sort of "group-think," by which Jews co-operate and thus lead the rest of the subjectivists, esp. among the gentiles, which gentiles are far less organized than the Jews, the Jews thus allowed and enabled thereby to dominate and manipulate these subjectivistic gentiles.

And note satanism is (extreme) subjectivism, the "philosophy" by which one makes oneself God, holding that consciousness/mentality is the genesis of all reality, the Jews merely colluding upon a collectivistic version of this subjectivism, Jews thus dominating the more nihilistic, dis-organized, individualistic subjectivist gentiles.

Such then is the philosophy, sociology, and psychology of Talmudism, extreme subjectivism and satanism, and the effect upon the corrupt gentile culture, originally founded upon Christianity and TRUTH (= Christ), truth understood as only meaningful as it is based upon the OBJECTIVE reality, objectivity a necessary philosophic assumption, that objective reality understood as God-given and -created.

Thus the necessary pretext to subjectivism (hence Talmudism/Judaism) is MORALISM, the fallacious and hereticalist idea of "good-evil," which doesn't exist in a God-given world of strict determinism and absolute cause-effect, the only will being God's will, there being no possible human "free"-will, humans being sinners, incapable of "good" which doesn't exist, there being no possible or conceivable premise/criterion, known to Christianity and St. Augustine as Pelagian heresy, equating to Pharisaism.

Wednesday, October 4, 2017

Hoffman, so busy virtue-signaling, can't figure-out simplest inductive logic regarding the satanic culture we have....

Below-copied essay first submitted at comments, https://revisionistreview.blogspot.c...-massacre.html

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *


Does Hoffman Understand Simplest Inductive Logic And Method?
(Apollonian, 4 Oct 17)

Hoffman: what's ur problem?--I'll tell u what it is. Ur problem is u don't care about logic, and this is why u admonish ur good correspondents, and even call them names. Because ur good commenters here, above, are supplying u w. good conclusions and observations founded in the best INDUCTION and scientific method, which works by means of particulars moving then to general conclusion. So let me now go over the specifics:

(a) USA and West are entirely under a SATANIC regime, this regime founded solidly upon CENTRAL-BANKING (see Mises.org for expo) which is literally legalized counterfeiting, having replaced real money, commodity-based, gold/silver being best, which can't be counterfeited, this real money now replaced w. "fiat"-CURRENCY which can be nearly infinitely replicated/proliferated ("inflation"), the currency previously existing now devalued by the evermore new currency being issued, the people now methodically despoiled, defrauded, and enslaved.

(b) Who then runs this overall SATANIC regime?--wouldn't it be the foremost Satanists?--those Satanists who make themselves co-equal w. God, whom u urself admit are "self-worshippers"? And while far more gentiles are Satanists (extreme subjectivists, holding consciousness the creator of reality), wouldn't the most organized, most cohesive Satanists naturally dominate against those gentile Satanists who are far more isolated fm one another, far less organized and cohesive, gentiles in fact dominated by foremost Satanists--like the masons are dominated by aforementioned far more organized, cohesive Satanists, masons taking orders therefrom?

(c) Who dominates the central-banking network?--isn't it these same foremost Satanists?--like Rothschilds and Sons of London, England for one, Moses Seif Israel Bank of Milan, Italy, for another?--not to mention the Rothschilds of Paris France? And who are the "Chairmen" of the US Federal Reserve?--aren't they of same foremost Satanists, like present-day Yellen, who followed Ben Bernanke?--who followed Alan Greenspan? etc.

(d) Who contributes 70% of national Democratic Party campaign funding?--isn't it these foremost Satanists?

(e) Doesn't Israeli terror-state get all raw NSA data without data being first screened fm American (USA) source?--doesn't this simple fact demonstrate absolute control, dominance, and mastery?--much like the mastery of the plantation owners of Haiti over their slaves?

So Hoffman why aren't these specific facts and observations significant for the INDUCTIVE CONCLUSION as to WHO it is at the top controlling, dominating, manipulating?--including for the relatively small-potatoes event recently in Las Vegas?

Given the proper inductive and scientific method, Hoffman, I'd say it's now ur obligation to DISPROVE that Jews aren't at the bottom of it all regarding latest Las Vegas incident--and ur good correspondents, above, are simply following logic and common sense and providing most excellent info for u--which u now reject as u merely want to flash cheap virtue-signaling to ur clients, the Jews, whom u imagine can ONLY be criticized by u as u imagine u occupy some kind of exalted position of the Pharisaic version of moralism.